4.8 Article

Stabilizing Zinc Anodes by Regulating the Electrical Double Layer with Saccharin Anions

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 38, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202100445

关键词

electrical double layer; saccharin; Zn anode; Zn ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572078, 51772086, 51872087, 51971089]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2018JJ2038]
  3. Major Science and Technology Program of Changsha [kq1804010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research shows that saccharin (Sac) as an electrolyte additive can regulate the electrical double layer (EDL) structure on the zinc anode, forming a unique solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) that effectively modulates zinc deposition behavior and prevents side reactions, thus improving battery performance.
Zn anodes suffer from poor Coulombic efficiency (CE) and serious dendrite formation due to the unstable anode/electrolyte interface (AEI). The electrical double layer (EDL) structure formed before cycling is of great significance for building stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on Zn surface but barely discussed in previous research about the stabilization of Zn anode. Herein, saccharin (Sac) is introduced as electrolyte additive for regulating the EDL structure on the AEI. It is found that Sac derived anions are preferentially adsorbed on the Zn metal surface instead of water dipole, creating a new H2O-poor EDL structure. Moreover, the unique SEI is also detected on the Zn surface due to the decomposition of Sac anions. Both are proved to be capable of modulating Zn deposition behavior and preventing side reactions. Encouragingly, Zn|Zn symmetric cells using Sac additive deliver a high cumulative plated capacity of 2.75 Ah cm(-2) and a high average CE of 99.6% under harsh test condition (10 mA cm(-2), 10 mAh cm(-2)). The excellent stability is also achieved at a high rate of 40 mA cm(-2). The effectiveness of this Sac additive is further demonstrated in the Zn-MnO2 full cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据