4.8 Review

Advances in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 29, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202003666

关键词

anodes; binders; cathodes; electrolytes; separators

资金

  1. Australian Renewable Energy Agency project [ARENA 2014/RND106]
  2. Australian Research Council through the ARC Discovery projects [DP170100436, DP180102297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, with their high energy density, show great potential as an energy storage system. Significant progress has been made in the past few decades, and there are promising prospects for the future.
Lithium-ion batteries, which have revolutionized portable electronics over the past three decades, were eventually recognized with the 2019 Nobel Prize in chemistry. As the energy density of current lithium-ion batteries is approaching its limit, developing new battery technologies beyond lithium-ion chemistry is significant for next-generation high energy storage. Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, which rely on the reversible redox reactions between lithium and sulfur, appears to be a promising energy storage system to take over from the conventional lithium-ion batteries for next-generation energy storage owing to their overwhelming energy density compared to the existing lithium-ion batteries today. Over the past 60 years, especially the past decade, significant academic and commercial progress has been made on Li-S batteries. From the concept of the sulfur cathode first proposed in the 1960s to the current commercial Li-S batteries used in unmanned aircraft, the story of Li-S batteries is full of breakthroughs and back tracing steps. Herein, the development and advancement of Li-S batteries in terms of sulfur-based composite cathode design, separator modification, binder improvement, electrolyte optimization, and lithium metal protection is summarized. An outlook on the future directions and prospects for Li-S batteries is also offered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据