4.8 Article

Revealing the Mechanism behind the Catastrophic Failure of n-i-p Type Perovskite Solar Cells under Operating Conditions and How to Suppress It

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 40, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202103820

关键词

catastrophic failure; ion migration; operation stability; perovskite solar cells

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0200700]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [YJKYYQ20180029, CAS-ITRI 2019010, 2020VCA0012]
  3. Jiangsu Science and Technology Program [SBX2019010084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The n-i-p type perovskite solar cells experience catastrophic failure due to shunting at the edge of the device and the influence of silver clusters.
The n-i-p type perovskite solar cells suffer unpredictable catastrophic failure under operation, which is a barrier for their commercialization. The fluorescence enhancement at Ag electrode edge and performance recovery after cutting the Ag electrode edge off prove that the shunting position is mainly located at the edge of device. Surface morphology and elemental analyses prove the corrosion of the Ag electrode and the diffusion of Ag+ ions on the edge for aged cells. Moreover, much condensed and larger Ag clusters are formed on the MoO3 layer. Such a contrast is also observed while comparing the central and the edge of the Ag/Spiro-OMeTAD film. Hence, the catastrophic failure mechanism can be concluded as photon-induced decomposition of the perovskite film and release reactive iodide species, which diffuse and react with the loose Ag clusters on the edge of the cell. The corrosion of the Ag electrode and the migration of Ag+ ions into Spiro-OMeTAD and perovskite films lead to the forming of conducting filament that shunts the cell. The more condensed Ag cluster on the MoO3 surface as well as the blocking of holes within the Spiro-OMeTAD/MoO3 interface successfully prevent the oxidation of Ag electrode and suppress the catastrophic failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据