4.8 Article

Biocompatible Blends of an Intrinsically Conducting Polymer as Stretchable Strain Sensors for Real-Time Monitoring of Starch-Based Food Processing

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 30, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202102745

关键词

food processing; food quality control; PEDOT:PSS; starch; strain sensors

资金

  1. Ministry of Education (MOE) [R284-000-197-114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A blend of starch and a biocompatible conducting polymer was reported as a stretchable strain sensor for real-time monitoring of starch-based food processing. The resistance of the blend reflects changes in food volume, aiding in optimizing processing conditions and controlling food quality.
Because stretchable strain sensors that have a resistance or capacitance sensitive to strain can sense skin deformation during physical movement, they have been extensively studied as wearable devices for healthcare monitoring. In principle, they can be used to monitor starch-based food processing in real time, since starch-based food can have remarkable volume change during processing. Monitoring starch-based food processing in real time can help achieve high quality and high productivity while reducing energy consumption. Nevertheless, there is no such report in the literature. Here, a blend of starch and a biocompatible intrinsically conducting polymer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), is reported as a stretchable strain sensor to monitor starch-based food processing including fermentation, steaming, storage, and refreshing in a real-time manner. The resistance of the blends increases during the food volume expansion mainly caused by the fermentation, steaming, and refreshing, and it decreases as a result of the food volume shrinkage during cooling or storage. The signals can be thus used to optimize the processing conditions and control the food quality. This technology can be easily combined with the Internet of Things.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据