4.7 Review

Adherence to minimal experimental requirements for defining extracellular vesicles and their functions

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113872

关键词

MISEV; Extracellular vesicles (EVs); Exosomes; Text mining; Data science; Regenerative medicine

资金

  1. European Union [733006]
  2. Land Salzburg IWB/EFRE [2014-2020 P1812596]
  3. WISS [20102-F1900731-KZP EV-TT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows a significant improvement in EV characterization in recent years, with papers using more methods and markers being more frequently cited. Papers citing MISEV criteria tend to use a higher number of characterization methods, indicating a positive impact of the guidelines on EV research quality.
Rigorous measures are required to cope with the advance of extracellular vesicle (EV) research, from 183 studies published in 2012 to 2,309 studies published in 2020. The International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) proposed Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV) guidelines in 2014, updated in 2018, for assuring and improving EV research quality. We performed a systematic review using a text mining approach to assess adherence to MISEV criteria. A keyword search was conducted in 5,093 accessible publications over the period 2012-2020 and analyzed the methodology used for EV isolation and characterization. We found a significant improvement over the years particularly regarding EV characterization where recent papers used a higher number of methods and EV markers to check for quantity and purity. Interestingly, we also found that EV papers using more methods and EV markers were cited more frequently. Papers citing MISEV criteria were more prone to use a higher number of characterization methods. We therefore established a concise checklist summarizing MISEV criteria to support EV researchers towards reaching the highest standards in the field. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据