4.7 Review

Prophylactic vaccine delivery systems against epidemic infectious diseases

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113867

关键词

Epidemic pathogens; Nano; micro vehicles; High efficiency; Long-term; Cross-protection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81930122, U20A20361, 32030062]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2202056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prophylactic vaccines have evolved from traditional whole-cell vaccines to safer subunit vaccines, but face challenges such as poor immunogenicity. Advanced delivery vectors play a crucial role in overcoming these challenges, offering efficient and safe immune responses. Summarizing and comparing delivery systems for infectious pathogens can provide insights for future vaccine development.
Prophylactic vaccines have evolved from traditional whole-cell vaccines to safer subunit vaccines. However, subunit vaccines still face problems, such as poor immunogenicity and low efficiency, while traditional adjuvants are usually unable to meet specific response needs. Advanced delivery vectors are important to overcome these barriers; they have favorable safety and effectiveness, tunable proper -ties, precise location, and immunomodulatory capabilities. Nevertheless, there has been no systematic summary of the delivery systems to cover a wide range of infectious pathogens. We herein summarized and compared the delivery systems for major or epidemic infectious diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. We also included the newly licensed vaccines (e.g., COVID-19 vaccines) and those close to licensure. Furthermore, we highlighted advanced delivery systems with high efficiency, cross-protection, or long-term protection against epidemic pathogens, and we put forward prospects and thoughts on the development of future prophylactic vaccines. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据