期刊
EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 866-874出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.049
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma; Sunitinib; Everolimus
资金
- Novartis
- NIH/NCI [P30CA016672]
- Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence
- Trust Family
- Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research
Background: Sunitinib and everolimus are standard first-line and second-line therapies, respectively, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Objective: To conduct a randomized phase 2 trial comparing sunitinib and everolimus in non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC). Design, setting, and participants: Patients with metastatic, non-ccRCC, or ccRCC with >20% sarcomatoid features (ccSRCC) were randomized to receive sunitinib or everolimus with crossover at disease progression. Outcome measurement and statistical analysis: Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line therapy; 108 patients were needed to show improvement in median PFS (mPFS) from 12 wk with sunitinib to 20 wk with everolimus. Results and limitations: Interim analysis of 68 patients (papillary [27], chromophobe [12], unclassified [10], translocation [7], ccSRCC [12]) prompted early trial closure. The mPFS in first-line therapy was 6.1 mo with sunitinib and 4.1 mo with everolimus (p = 0.6); median overall survival (mOS) was not reached with sunitinib and was 10.5 mo with everolimus, respectively (p = 0.014). At final analysis, mOS was 16.2 and 14.9 mo with sunitinib and everolimus, respectively (p = 0.18). There were four partial responses (PRs) in first-line therapy (sunitinib: 3 of 33 [9%]; everolimus, 1 of 35 [2.8%]) and four PRs in second-line therapy (sunitinib: 2 of 21 [9.5%]; everolimus, 2 of 23 [8.6%]), with mPFS of 1.8 mo and 2.8 mo, respectively. In patients without sarcomatoid features in their tumors (n = 49), mOS was 31.6 mo with sunitinib and 10.5 mo with everolimus (p = 0.075). Genomic profiling of a chromophobe RCC from a patient with a PR to first-line everolimus revealed a somatic TSC2 mutation. Conclusions: In this trial, everolimus was not superior to sunitinib. Both agents demonstrated modest efficacy, underscoring the need for better therapies in non-ccRCC. Patient summary: This randomized phase 2 trial provides the first head-to-head comparison of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC). The observed very modest efficacy underscores the need to develop more effective therapies for non-ccRCC. (C) 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据