4.6 Article

Cytokine Panel for Response to Intravesical Therapy (CyPRIT): Nomogram of Changes in Urinary Cytokine Levels Predicts Patient Response to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 197-200

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.023

关键词

Bladder cancer; Bacillus Calmette-Guerin response; Nomogram; Prediction; Urinary cytokines

资金

  1. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  2. MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Institutes of Health [CA016672]
  3. GU (Bladder SPORE) [P50 CA091846]
  4. Alere Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The response of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to intravesical immuno-therapy with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) depends on adequate stimulation of an immune response. Although BCG has been used for decades, we lack tools to accurately predict response in individual patients. To address this deficiency, we initiated a clinical trial in patients with intermediate-and high-risk NMIBC. BCG was administered according to the Southwest Oncology Group protocol. Urine samples were collected for cytokine assay at baseline, immediately before and after BCG instillation at 6 wk, and immediately before and after the third BCG instillation of the first maintenance course. Levels of 12 cytokines were measured, and changes from baseline were calculated after treatment. A total of 130 patients were enrolled. Increases in single cytokines correlated with recurrence, but the best predictor of recurrence was changes in a combination of cytokines. A nomogram (CyPRIT) constructed using urinary levels of nine inducible cytokines (IL-2, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1ra, IL-10, IL-12[p70], IL-12[p40], TRAIL, and TNF-alpha) predicted the likelihood of recurrence with 85.5% accuracy (95% confidence interval 77.9-93.1%). This cytokine panel and nomogram have potential for identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence during BCG treatment to guide modification of the dose and duration of BCG immunotherapy. (C) 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据