4.4 Article

Comparison between wide-field digital imaging system and the red reflex test for universal newborn eye screening in Brazil

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 E1198-E1205

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14759

关键词

neonatal screening; diagnostic techniques; ophthalmological; prevention and control; public health; growth and development

资金

  1. Heed Fellowship through the Society of Heed Fellows
  2. Heed Ophthalmic Foundation
  3. Michels Fellowship Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared neonatal eye screenings using the red reflex test (RRT) versus the wide-field digital imaging (WFDI) system. Results showed that WFDI detected more abnormalities, including treatable pathology missed by RRT, with a higher sensitivity than the current gold standard. Universal WFDI allows for early detection and management of potentially blinding ophthalmic diseases.
Purpose To compare neonatal eye screening using the red reflex test (RRT) versus the wide-field digital imaging (WFDI) system. Methods Prospective cohort study. Newborns (n = 380, 760 eyes) in the Maternity Ward of Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia de Sao Paulo hospital from May to July 2014 underwent RRT by a paediatrician and WFDI performed by the authors. Wide-field digital imaging (WFDI) images were analysed by the authors. Validity of the paediatrician's RRT was assessed by unweighted kappa [kappa] statistic, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results While WFDI showed abnormalities in 130 eyes (17.1%), RRT was only abnormal in 13 eyes (1.7%). Wide-field digital imaging (WFDI) detected treatable retina pathology that RRT missed including hyphema, CMV retinitis, FEVR and a vitreous haemorrhage. The sensitivity of the paediatrician's RRT to detect abnormalities was poor at 0.77% (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.02%-4.21%) with a PPV of only 7.69% (95% CI, 1.08%-38.85%). Overall, there was no agreement between screening modalities (kappa = -0.02, 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.01). The number needed to screen to detect ocular abnormalities using WFDI was 5.9 newborns and to detect treatable abnormalities was 76 newborns. Conclusion While RRT detects gross abnormalities that preclude visualization of the retina (i.e. media opacities and very large tumours), only WFDI consistently detects subtle treatable retina and optic nerve pathology. With a higher sensitivity than the current gold standard, universal WFDI allows for early detection and management of potentially blinding ophthalmic disease missed by RRT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据