4.3 Article

Impaired neck motor control in chronic whiplash and tension-type headache

期刊

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 144, 期 4, 页码 394-399

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ane.13473

关键词

head movements; laser tracking; motor control; tension‐ type headache; Whiplash

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new method using laser tracking to measure precise quantitative head or hand movements, showing significant coordination impairments in patients with chronic whiplash and tension-type headache. This suggests the involvement of the central nervous system in the pathology of these diseases.
Objectives The purpose of this study is twofold, first to present a new method based on head laser tracking designed to measure head or hand movements and second to further investigate if patients suffering from chronic whiplash or tension-type headache have impaired motor control of neck muscles. Material and Methods A new laser tracking instrument was designed to measure the ability of a test person to track a reference point moving on the wall by a laser fixed to the forehead or held in the hand. The reference point to be tracked moves in runs of a circle or a square at three different speeds 10, 20, or 30 cm/s. We used a 1 x 1 x1 m setup geometry to provide head movements well below pain release. Groups of 22 patients diagnosed with chronic whiplash-associated disorder grade 2, 19 patients diagnosed with chronic tension-type headache, and 37 control persons were compared. Results A small but highly significant dyscoordination of head movements was observed in both patient groups and in whiplash also of the hand. Conclusions Our study presents a new method based on laser tracking for precision quantitative measurements of head or hand movements during standardized conditions. The results confirm that motor control of head movements is impaired in both chronic whiplash and tension-type headache, and in whiplash also of the hand. This suggests involvement of the central nervous system in the pathology of these diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据