4.2 Article

Impact of recurrence pattern in patients undergoing a second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma

期刊

ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 441-446

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-021-01765-4

关键词

Glioblastoma; Recurrent glioblastoma; Second surgery; Pattern of failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of different patterns of GBM recurrence on second surgery outcomes was investigated in a study at Pisa University Hospital. Patients with local recurrence had better overall survival (OS) compared to those with non-local recurrence, and the advantage of a second surgery was more pronounced in patients with local recurrence. The study suggests that recurrence patterns can influence the outcomes of recurrent GBM patients eligible for a second surgery.
The impact of different patterns of glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence has not yet been fully established in patients suitable for a second surgery. Through the present observational study carried out at Pisa University Hospital, we aimed to investigate how different patterns of GBM failure influence second surgery outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were assessed according to clinical characteristics, including pattern of recurrence, in a prospective cohort of recurrent GBM patients. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was applied to evaluate the differences between curves. Patients with local recurrence had better OS than patients with non-local one, 24.1 versus 18.2 months, respectively [P = 0.015, HR = 1.856 (1.130-3.050)]. The second surgery conferred an advantage in OS respect to non-operated patients, however, this advantage was more evident in patients with local recurrence [P = 0.002 with HR 0.212 (95% CI 0.081-0.552) and P = 0.029 with HR = 0.522 (95% CI 0.291-0.936), respectively]. The recurrence pattern can influence the outcome of patients with recurrent GBM suitable for a second surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据