4.7 Article

Towards damage resistant Al2O3-SiO2 glasses with structural and chemical heterogeneities through consolidation of glassy nanoparticles

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117016

关键词

Al2O3-SiO2 glass; Structural heterogeneity; Chemical heterogeneity; Glassy nanoparticle consolidation; Damage resistance; Work hardening; Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1508410, DMR-1936368, DMR-2015557]
  2. Corning Glass Age Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consolidating glassy nanoparticles with different compositions can prepare Al2O3-SiO2 binary glasses with structural and chemical heterogeneities, exhibiting excellent ductility and enhanced flow strength, offering a novel method for synthesizing strong and transparent oxide glasses.
Al2O3-SiO2 binary glasses with structural and chemical heterogeneities were prepared by consolidating glassy nanoparticles with different compositions using classical molecular dynamics simulations. Consolidated glasses show both excellent ductility and enhanced flow strength. It was found that the structural heterogeneities such as over-coordinated network formers and neighboring oxygen induced during consolidation serve as plasticity carriers to increase the ductility. On the other hand, the enhanced yield strength in consolidated glasses is due to the chemical heterogeneity inherited from the starting glassy nanoparticles, which does not compromise the ductility. Furthermore, apparent work hardening behavior appears upon cold work in the consolidated glasses, with an increase in yield strength from similar to 3.3 to similar to 6.4 GPa after 40% cold work. Consolidation with glassy nanoparticles could be a viable way to synthesize strong, damage resistant and transparent oxide glasses that cannot be obtained through the traditional melt-quench process. (C) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据