4.5 Article

Silencing lncRNA GAS5 alleviates apoptosis and fibrosis in diabetic cardiomyopathy by targeting miR-26a/b-5p

期刊

ACTA DIABETOLOGICA
卷 58, 期 11, 页码 1491-1501

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-021-01745-3

关键词

Diabetic cardiomyopathy; Apoptosis; GAS5; MiR-126a-5p; MiR-126b-5p

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that GAS5 is upregulated in diabetic cardiomyopathy and promotes DCM progression by regulating miR-26a/b-5p. Knockdown of GAS5 can alleviate myocardial fibrosis and high glucose-induced cardiomyocyte injury. This suggests that GAS5 may be a potential therapeutic target for DCM.
Background LncRNA GAS5 is associated with high glucose-induced cardiomyocyte injury, but its role in diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains unclear. Methods Mice were administered with streptozotocin to construct the diabetic model (DM). Primary mouse cardiomyocytes were isolated and treated with 30 mmol/L high glucose to mimic the diabetic condition in vitro. GAS5 expression was detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The relationship between GAS5 and miR-26a/b-5p was determined by bioinformatic prediction, luciferase reporter assay and RNA immunoprecipitation assay. The cardiac function of diabetic mice was evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiography. Results GAS5 was significantly upregulated in diabetic cardiomyopathy both in vitro and in vivo. GAS5 knockdown and miR-26a/b-5p overexpression not only effectively attenuated myocardial fibrosis of diabetic mice in vivo but also inhibited high glucose-induced cardiomyocyte injury in vitro. miR-26a/b-5p was identified as a target of GAS5. GAS5 knockdown efficiently attenuated myocardial fibrosis and high glucose-induced cardiomyocyte injury through negatively regulating miR-26a/b-p. Conclusion Our study showed that GAS5 promotes DCM progression by regulating miR-26a/b-5p, suggesting that GAS5 might be a potential therapeutic target for DCM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据