4.8 Article

Linear and Helical Cesium Iodide Atomic Chains in Ultranarrow Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Impact on Optical Properties

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 13389-13398

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03705

关键词

atomic chains; carbon nanotubes; electron microscopy; density functional theory Raman spectroscopy; photoluminescence

资金

  1. EPSRC (UK) [EP/N010825/1, EP/M011925/1, EP/M010643/1, EP/R019428/1]
  2. Russian Government
  3. EPSRC [EP/R019428/1, EP/M010643/1, EP/N010825/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of one-dimensional CsI chains and helical chains within carbon nanotubes of different diameters has been demonstrated, showing varying effects on the encapsulating tubes' structure and electronic properties. Analysis using density-functional theory and Bader analysis was conducted to understand the observed changes.
One-dimensional (1D) atomic chains of CsI were previously reported in double-walled carbon nanotubes with similar to 0.8 nm inner diameter. Here, we demonstrate that, while 1D CsI chains form within narrow similar to 0.73 nm diameter single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), wider SWCNT tubules (similar to 0.8-1.1 nm) promote the formation of helical chains of CsI 2 x 1 atoms in cross-section. These CsI helices create complementary oval distortions in encapsulating SWCNTs with highly strained helices formed from strained Cs2I2 parallelogram units in narrow tubes to lower strain Cs2I2 units in wider tubes. The observed structural changes and charge distribution were analyzed by density-functional theory and Bader analysis. CsI chains also produce conformation-selective changes to the electronic structure and optical properties of the encapsulating tubules. The observed defects are an interesting variation from defects commonly observed in alkali halides as these are normally associated with the Schottky and Frenkel type. The energetics of CsI 2 x 1 helix formation in SWCNTs suggests how these could be controllably formed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据