4.8 Article

Impact of 2D-3D Heterointerface on Remote Epitaxial Interaction through Graphene

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 10587-10596

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03296

关键词

remote epitaxy; graphene; single-crystal membrane; transfer process; ionicity; heterointegration

资金

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Young Faculty Award [029584-00001]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technologies Office [DE-EE0008558]
  3. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA9453-18-2-0017, FA9453-21-C0717]
  4. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [027049-00001]
  5. Penn State 2D Crystal Consortium (2DCC)-Materials Innovation Platform (2DCC-MIP) under NSF [DMR-1539916]
  6. National Science Foundation (Platform for the Accelerated Realization, Analysis and Discovery of Interface Materials (PARADIM)) [DMR-1539918]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remote epitaxy is a promising technique for epitaxy of functional materials that can be released from substrates with atomic precision, enabling flexible, transferrable, and stackable freestanding single-crystalline membranes. The interaction of atoms and adatoms through 2D materials in remote epitaxy allows investigation and utilization of electrical/chemical/physical coupling of bulk materials via 2D materials.
Remote epitaxy has drawn attention as it offers epitaxy of functional materials that can be released from the substrates with atomic precision, thus enabling production and heterointegration of flexible, transferrable, and stackable freestanding single-crystalline membranes. In addition, the remote interaction of atoms and adatoms through two-dimensional (2D) materials in remote epitaxy allows investigation and utilization of electrical/chemical/physical coupling of bulk (3D) materials via 2D materials (3D-2D-3D coupling). Here, we unveil the respective roles and impacts of the substrate material, graphene, substrate-graphene interface, and epitaxial material for electrostatic coupling of these materials, which governs cohesive ordering and can lead to single-crystal epitaxy in the overlying film. We show that simply coating a graphene layer on wafers does not guarantee successful implementation of remote epitaxy, since atomically precise control of the graphene-coated interface is required, and provides key considerations for maximizing the remote electrostatic interaction between the substrate and adatoms. This was enabled by exploring various material systems and processing conditions, and we demonstrate that the rules of remote epitaxy vary significantly depending on the ionicity of material systems as well as the graphene-substrate interface and the epitaxy environment. The general rule of thumb discovered here enables expanding 3D material libraries that can be stacked in freestanding form.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据