4.8 Article

Ti-Oxo Clusters with Peripheral Alkyl Groups as Cathode Interlayers for Efficient Organic Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 33, 页码 39671-39677

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c11332

关键词

organic solar cells; cathode interlayers; power conversion efficiency; Ti-oxo clusters; titanium oxide nanomaterial

资金

  1. MOST [2018YFA0208504, 2017YFA0204702, 2020YFC1909002]
  2. NSFC of China [21801213, 51773207, 52073016, 5197030531, 21905018]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XK1802-2]
  4. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm202043]
  5. Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology [20192ACB20009, 20202ACBL213004, 20203BBE53062]
  6. Jiangxi Academy of Sciences [2020YZD-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three independent Ti-oxo clusters with precise chemical structures are developed as cathode interlayers in OSCs, providing high power conversion efficiency. These TOCs have excellent solubility, well-aligned work function, and can easily form smooth films.
Three independent Ti-oxo clusters (TOCs) that contain 6, 8, and 12 Ti atoms in the cores and alkyl groups on the surface were developed as cathode interlayers in bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells (OSCs). These TOCs have precise chemical structures with a single crystal, excellent solubility in methanol, and well-aligned work function. Smooth films can be facilely obtained by spin-casting their solution on top of the active layer. Therefore, they can be used as an interlayer in OSCs to provide a high power conversion efficiency (17.29%). Further studies reveal that these TOCs can not only reduce the work function of the silver electrode to provide better energy level alignment but also exhibit a significant n-doping effect with the non-fullerene acceptors to facilitate efficient electron extraction and transport. Our results demonstrate that TOCs as semiconductors have great potential application in OSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据