4.8 Article

TiO2 Nanofiber-Modified Lithium Metal Composite Anode for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 24, 页码 28398-28404

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c07761

关键词

solid-state batteries; lithium metal composite anode; TiO2 nanofibers; interface contact; one-dimensional additives

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51802224]
  2. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [19QA1409300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully improved the interface wettability of SSLMBs by introducing TiO2 nanofibers, achieving seamless contact between Li metal and LLZTO, enhancing performance and critical current density.
Solid-state lithium metal batteries (SSLMBs), using lithium metal as the anode and garnet-structured Li6.5La3Zr1.5Ta0.5O12 (LLZTO) as the electrolyte, are attractive and promising due to their high energy density and safety. However, the interface contact between the lithium metal and LLZTO is a major obstacle to the performance of SSLMBs. Here, we successfully improve the interface wettability by introducing one-dimensional (1D) TiO2 nanofibers into the lithium metal to obtain a Li-lithiated TiO2 composite anode (Li-TiO2). When 10 wt % TiO2 nanofibers are added, the formed composite anode offers a seamless interface contact with LLZTO and enables an interfacial resistance of 27 Omega cm(2), which is much smaller than 374 Omega cm(2) of pristine lithium metal. Due to the enhanced interface wettability, the symmetric Li-TiO2 ILLZTOILi-TiO2 cell upgrades the critical current density to 2.2 mA cm(-2) and endures stable cycling over 550 h. Furthermore, by coupling the Li-TiO2 composite anode with the LiFePO4 cathode, the full cell shows stable cycling performance. This work proves the role of TiO2 nanofibers in enhancing the interface contact between the garnet electrolyte and the lithium metal anode and improving the performance of SSLMBs and provides an effective approach with 1D additives for solving the interface issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据