4.8 Article

Autophagy-Dependent Apoptosis Induced by Apoferritin-Cu(II) Nanoparticles in Multidrug-Resistant Colon Cancer Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 33, 页码 38959-38968

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c07223

关键词

antitumor; apoferritin; autophagy-dependent apoptosis; copper(II) complex; multidrug resistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21525105, 21778079, 21977126]
  2. Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou [201806010136]
  3. Guangdong Natural Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [2021B1515020102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a therapeutic copper polypyridine complex encapsulated in a natural nanocarrier, apoferritin, which shows higher cytotoxicity towards drug-resistant cancer cells compared to noncancerous cells. The compound triggers cell autophagy-dependent apoptosis, leading to cell death. Injection of this nanodrug conjugate into a mouse model with multidrug-resistant colon tumor results in a strong inhibition of tumor growth.
Chemotherapy continues to be the most commonly applied strategy for cancer. Despite the impressive clinical success obtained with several drugs, increasing numbers of (multi)drug-resistant tumors are reported. To overcome this shortcoming, novel drug candidates and delivery systems are urgently needed. Herein, a therapeutic copper polypyridine complex encapsulated in natural nanocarrier apoferritin is reported. The generated nanoparticles showed higher cytotoxicity toward various (drugresistant) cancer cell lines than noncancerous cells. The study of the mechanism revealed that the compound triggers cell autophagy-dependent apoptosis. Promisingly, upon injection of the nanodrug conjugate into the bloodstream of a mouse model bearing a multidrug-resistant colon tumor, a strong tumor growth inhibition effect was observed. To date, this is the first study describing the encapsulation of a copper complex in apoferritin that acts by autophagy-dependent apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据