4.8 Article

Oxygen Vacancy-Rich RuO2-Co3O4 Nanohybrids as Improved Electrocatalysts for Li-O2 Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 33, 页码 39239-39247

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c08720

关键词

synergistic effect; oxygen vacancy; hollow structures; cathode catalysts; Li-O-2 batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21606021]
  2. Youth Scholars Program of Beijing Normal University [2019NTST08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesized RuO2-Co3O4 nanohybrid for lithium-oxygen batteries effectively reduces overpotential and improves circulatory performance, cycling stably for over 100 cycles. The introduction of RuO2 increases the oxygen vacancy concentration of Co3O4, accelerating charge transfer and reducing the adsorption energy of LiO2 intermediate, thus lowering overpotential effectively.
Lithium oxygen (Li-O-2) batteries have shown great potential as new energy-storage devices due to the high theoretical energy density. However, there are still substantial problems to be solved before practical application, including large overpotential, low energy efficiency, and poor cycle life. Herein, we have successfully synthesized a RuO2-Co3O4 nanohybrid with a rich oxygen vacancy and large specific surface area. The Li-O-2 batteries based on the RuO2-Co3O4 nanohybrid shown obviously reduced overpotential and improved circulatory property, which can cycle stably for more than 100 cycles at a current density of 200 mA g(-1). Experimental results and density function theory calculation prove that the introduction of RuO2 can increase oxygen vacancy concentration of Co3O4 and accelerate the charge transfer. Meanwhile, the hollow and porous structure leads to a large specific surface area about 104.5 m(2) g(-1), exposing more active sites. Due to the synergistic effect, the catalyst of the RuO2-Co3O4 nanohybrid can significantly reduce the adsorption energy of the LiO2 intermediate, thereby reducing the overpotential effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据