4.8 Article

Enhancing Thermoelectric Performance of Yb0.3Co4Sb12 by Synergistically Optimized Carrier Concentration and Ionized Impurity Scattering

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 33, 页码 39533-39540

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c12862

关键词

skutterudites; Ge doping; electronic thermal conductivity; carrier concentration; ionized impurity scattering; thermoelectric properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771065, 51871082]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [ZD2020E003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research indicates that controlling the strength of ionized impurity scattering is crucial for achieving desirable thermoelectric performance in high Yb-filled skutterudites.
Previous results indicated that acceptor doping was considered an effective clue to substantially suppress electronic thermal conductivity and in the meanwhile hold a rather low lattice thermal conductivity in high Yb-filled skutterudites. However, the strength of ionized impurity scattering needs to be regulated elaborately to balance the enhanced Seebeck coefficient and the deteriorated carrier mobility. In this work, Ge doping not only synergistically modulates the Fermi energy level and strength of ionized impurity scattering to an optimal range and attains a benign power factor but also offers a valuable opportunity to further suppress kappa(e) and. in the classic Yb0.3Co4Sb12 alloy. Since the Yb0.3Co4Sb11.75Ge0.25 sample is endowed with the most highlighted ZT value in the device application temperature range, a promising average ZT value of 1.00 across the 300-823 K is achieved, reaching up to the level of a typical triple-filled skutterudite, which is highly desirable for achieving a satisfactory theoretical conversion efficiency of similar to 14.5%. Our work corroborates that the ionized impurity strength is an extremely critical benchmark to obtain desirable thermoelectric performance in the high Yb-filled skutterudites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据