4.8 Article

Co-assembly of Peptides and Carbon Nanodots: Sensitive Analysis of Transglutaminase 2

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 31, 页码 36919-36925

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c10326

关键词

peptide co-assembly; multicomponent assembly; carbon nanodots (CNDs); transglutaminase 2 (TG2) identification; electrochemical assay

资金

  1. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia [875]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772593]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [14380163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the co-assembly of peptides and carbon nanodots (CNDs) using non-covalent binding, combining the recognition capability of peptides with the catalytic activity of CNDs. The assembled structure was used for sensitive analysis of transglutaminase 2 with a low detection limit of 0.25 pg/mL. This strategy can be developed into a universal model for building co-assemblies of peptides and nanomaterials, expanding their applications in biological and biomedical research.
The structures assembled by peptides have attracted great attention due to their unique physicochemical properties. Moreover, the co-assembly of peptides with additional components can endow the structures with extended functions. In this work, we have explored the co-assembly of peptides and carbon nanodots (CNDs) by taking advantage of their non-covalent binding; thus, the obtained structure may show both the recognition capability of peptides and the catalytic activity of CNDs. Therefore, we have further used the assembled structure for the sensitive analysis of transglutaminase 2 with a low detection limit of 0.25 pg/mL. By simply replacing the peptide sequences or the nanomaterials, the strategy proposed in this work can be developed as a universal model to build the co-assemblies of peptides and nanomaterials, thus leading to their broader applications in biological and biomedical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据