4.6 Article

Associations Between ADC and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Tumor-Stroma Ratio and Vimentin Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 S107-S113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.007

关键词

Head and neck squamous cell cancer; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used DWI to investigate the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-stroma ratio, and vimentin expression in HNSCC. The results showed that ADC skewness and kurtosis histogram parameters can reflect tumor compartments in HNSCC. ADC entropy was significantly associated with TIL within the tumor compartment.
Rationale and Objectives: The present study used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to elucidate possible associations with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), tumor-stroma ratio and vimentin expression in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Materials and Methods: 30 patients with primary HNSCC of different localizations were involved in the study. DWI was obtained on a 3 T scanner. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) images were analyzed with a whole lesion measurement using a histogram approach. TIL- and vimentin-expression was calculated on biopsy samples before any form of treatment. Results: Tumor-stroma ratio correlated with ADC kurtosis (r = 0.46, p = 0.01) and ADC skewness (r = 0.42, p = 0.02). Several ADC parameters were significantly different between stroma rich und tumor rich tumors. ADC entropy correlated significantly with the expression of TIL within the tumor compartment (r = 0.44, p = 0.01). No associations were identified between ADC parameters and vimentin expression. Conclusion: ADC skewness and kurtosis histogram parameters can reflect tumor compartments in HNSCC. ADC entropy was associated with TIL of the tumor compartment but not with those of the stroma compartment, which emphasizes the ability of ADC histogram parameters to reflect distinctive differences of tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据