4.6 Editorial Material

The Dissolution of the Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination and the Duty of Medical Educators to Step Up the Effectiveness of Clinical Skills Assessment Comment

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 96, 期 9, 页码 1242-1246

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004216

关键词

-

资金

  1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)
  2. SEEF (Strategic Educators Enhancement Fund) Fellowship
  3. National Board of Medical Educators (NBME)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors discuss the implications of discontinuing Step 2 CS for medical student clinical skills assessment, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts to improve assessment standards and ensure graduates are ready for residency training. Their recommendations include defining national standards, creating a resource center for assessments, and enhancing workplace-based evaluations to earn public trust in medical education.
In this Invited Commentary, the authors explore the implications of the dissolution of the Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination (Step 2 CS) for medical student clinical skills assessment. The authors describe the need for medical educators (at both the undergraduate and graduate levels) to work collaboratively to improve medical student clinical skills assessment to assure the public that medical school graduates have the requisite skills to begin residency training. The authors outline 6 specific recommendations for how to capitalize on the discontinuation of Step 2 CS to improve clinical skills assessment: (1) defining national, end-of-clerkship, and transition-to-residency standards for required clinical skills and for levels of competence; (2) creating a national resource for standardized patient, augmented reality, and virtual reality assessments; (3) improving workplace-based assessment through local collaborations and national resources; (4) improving learner engagement in and coproduction of assessments; (5) requiring, as a new standard for accreditation, medical schools to establish and maintain competency committees; and (6) establishing a national registry of assessment data for research and evaluation. Together, these actions will help the medical education community earn the public's trust by enhancing the rigor of assessment to ensure the mastery of skills that are essential to providing safe, high-quality care for patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据