4.5 Review

Selected previous findings on the factors influencing the gluing quality of solid wood products in timber construction and possible developments: A review

期刊

WOOD MATERIAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 230-241

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2021.1925963

关键词

Glued laminated timber; quality control; adhesives and gluing

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Framework Programme [739574]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [773324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review systematically evaluates various factors affecting the bonding quality of timber construction elements, provides solutions and open research questions, and aims to create a basis for controlled and stable manufacturing processes.
Various factors affect the bonding quality of elements used for timber construction. This review includes literature studies and personal experiences related to relevant technological variables defining glue bond performance in glue-laminated timber elements during their service life. The gluing of hardwood species receives special focus as it is considered by the industry to be the most challenging process for implementation. In particular, the effects of wood species, type of adhesive, glued-wood surface quality, physical and/or chemical modification of the wood, technological solutions for gluing, and varying climatic conditions during the use phase (relative humidity, temperature, air circulation, etc.) are considered. In addition, overlapping of individual influencing factors often leads to problems with bonding, thus requiring strongly integrating measurement methods (e.g. NIR spectroscopy). The causes of variations in the results when glued wood is tested using different standardized methods are discussed. A list of open research questions is provided, and problem solutions are recommended based on systematized cutting-edge knowledge. The aim of the work is to systematize the state of knowledge of wood gluing to create a basis for controlled and stable manufacturing processes. The progress of the work will be reported in further publications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据