4.5 Article

Innovation of helical cutting tool edge for eco-friendly milling of wood-based materials

期刊

WOOD MATERIAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 607-616

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2021.1912174

关键词

Chip flow and shape; edge radius wear; helical cutting tool; noise level; surface roughness; wood-based material

资金

  1. Directorate of Higher Education (DIKTI), Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia [1/E1/KP, PTNBH/2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that helical cutting tools with larger inclination angles have better wear resistance, surface quality, and noise control effects when milling wood-based materials. Edge radius wear, chip flow, surface roughness, and noise level decrease with increasing inclination angle of the cutting tool edge.
An extreme inclination angle of helical cutting tool edge has been developed in milling of new commercially wood-based materials. The purpose of this research was to investigate wear resistance, chip flow and shape, surface roughness, and noise level of helical edge cutting tools in milling wood-based materials. The wood-based materials of wood plastic composite, laminated veneer lumber, and oriented strand board were cut by the helical edge cutting tools (inclination angle of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, and 75 degrees) in the up-milling and down-milling processes on a computer numerical control router. Feed speed was set up in 2, 3, and 4 m/min. The results show that the helical edges provide better wear resistance, better surface quality, and lower noise emission compared to the conventional edge (0 degrees). Edge radius wear, chip flow area and flight speed, surface roughness, and noise level decreased with increasing the inclination angle of the cutting tool edges. The differences in the wood-based material structure, the milling process, and the feed speed resulted in the difference in cutting tool wear, chip flow and shape, surface roughness, and noise level phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据