期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40594-021-00273-4
关键词
Instructional change; Teams; Grounded theory; Leadership; Faculty; STEM
资金
- National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education [1525393]
- Division Of Undergraduate Education
- Direct For Education and Human Resources [1525393] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
This study examines team-based instructional change in undergraduate STEM education by interviewing 23 team members across 4 teams at 3 institutions in the USA. The research identifies five key team processes and three emergent states that impact teamwork and outcomes. Further investigation with more teams is needed due to the complexity of team dynamics.
Background Team-based instructional change is a promising model for improving undergraduate STEM instruction. Teams are more likely to produce sustainable, innovative, and high-quality outcomes than individuals working alone. However, teams also tend to involve higher risks of failure and can result in inefficient allocation of valuable resources. At this point, there is limited knowledge of how teams in the context of STEM higher education should work to achieve desirable outcomes. Results In this study, we collect semi-structured interview data from 23 team members from a total of 4 teams at 3 institutions across the USA. We analyze the results using a grounded theory approach and connect them to the existing literature. This study builds upon the first part of our work that developed a model of team inputs that lead to team outcomes. In this part, we identify the mechanisms by which input characteristics influence teamwork and outcomes. Team member data expand this initial model by identifying key aspects of team processes and emergent states. In this paper, we present five team processes: strategic leadership, egalitarian power dynamics, team member commitment, effective communication, and clear decision-making processes, that shape how teams work together, and three emergent states: shared vision, psychological safety, and team cohesion, that team members perceived as important aspects of how teams feel and think when working together. Conclusions This work furthers our understanding of how instructional change teams can be successful. However, due to the highly complex nature of teams, further investigation with more teams is required to test and enrich the emerging theory.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据