4.5 Article

Electrophysiological and histological changes of paraspinal muscles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

期刊

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 3146-3153

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4628-8

关键词

Idiopathic scoliosis; Muscle biopsy; Neurophysiology; EMG; Paraspinal muscles

资金

  1. Czech Research Grant Projects [PRVOUK P34, IGA NT 13693, 260168/SVV/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains poorly understood. To date, potentially involved local changes in the deep paraspinal muscles still remain unknown. Needle electromyography (EMG) and muscle biopsy of paraspinal muscles at convexity and concavity of the AIS main thoracic curve were performed in 25 subjects. In this group, EMG was performed in 16 AIS subjects (12 females, 12-27 years), muscle biopsy in 18 AIS subjects (15 females, 11-31 years) compared to 10 non-scoliotic controls (6 females, 12-55 years). Samples of muscle tissue were removed during corrective surgery and were examined histologically, enzyme histochemically and immunohistochemically. Both methods of EMG and muscle biopsy were performed in 9 subjects (7 women, 12-27 years). Right curve convexity was found in 24 AIS subjects. Amplitudes of motor unit action potentials (MUPs) were significantly increased on the AIS curve convexity versus concavity. Turns, duration and phases of MUPs were without any significant changes. In all 18 subjects, the histological examination revealed muscle fiber redistribution with numerical predominance of type I on the curve convexity which strongly correlated with the progression of the Cobb angle. Our findings demonstrate significant changes of muscle fiber redistribution in the paraspinal muscles of AIS with increased proportion of type I on the convexity corresponding to a significantly higher amplitude of MUPs on the same side. A possible explanation of this alteration is a secondary adaptation due to chronic high load demand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据