4.7 Article

Multi-Feature Patch-Based Segmentation Technique in the Gray-Centered RGB Color Space for Improved Apple Target Recognition

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11030273

关键词

fruit segmentation; color space; segmentation algorithm

类别

资金

  1. science and technology projects in Shaanxi Province Development and Application of key equipment for Orchard Mechanization and Intelligence [2020zdzx03-04-01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61971005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel method for apple image segmentation using multiple feature selection and gray-centered RGB color space, which can efficiently and accurately identify apple targets. In experiments, the proposed method demonstrated very high accuracy and recall rates.
In the vision system of apple-picking robots, the main challenge is to rapidly and accurately identify the apple targets with varying halation and shadows on their surfaces. To solve this problem, this study proposes a novel, multi-feature, patch-based apple image segmentation technique using the gray-centered red-green-blue (RGB) color space. The developed method presents a multi-feature selection process, which eliminates the effect of halation and shadows in apple images. By exploring all the features of the image, including halation and shadows, in the gray-centered RGB color space, the proposed algorithm, which is a generalization of K-means clustering algorithm, provides an efficient target segmentation result. The proposed method is tested on 240 apple images. It offered an average accuracy rate of 98.79%, a recall rate of 99.91%, an F1 measure of 99.35%, a false positive rate of 0.04%, and a false negative rate of 1.18%. Compared with the classical segmentation methods and conventional clustering algorithms, as well as the popular deep-learning segmentation algorithms, the proposed method can perform with high efficiency and accuracy to guide robotic harvesting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据