Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis

Background In locations where the alveolar bone height is low, such as at the maxillary molars, implant placement can be difficult, or even impossible, without procedures aimed at generating new bone, such as sinus lifts. Various types of bone graft materials are used after a sinus lift. In our study, a three-dimensional image analysis using a volume analyzer was performed to measure and compare the volume of demineralized bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss (R)) and carbonate apatite (Cytrans (R)) after a sinus lift, as well as the amount of bone graft material resorption. Patient data were collected from cone-beam computed tomography images taken before, immediately following, and 6 months after the sinus lift. Using these images, both the volume and amount of resorption of each bone graft material were measured using a three-dimensional image analysis system. Results The amount of bone resorption in the Bio-Oss (R)-treated group was 25.2%, whereas that of the Cytrans (R)-treated group was 14.2%. A significant difference was found between the two groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions Our findings indicate that the volume of bone resorption was smaller in the Cytrans (R)-treated group than in the Bio-Oss (R)-treated group, suggesting that Cytrans (R) is more promising for successful implant treatments requiring a sinus lift.

Automated summary

The study compared the volume and amount of bone resorption of demineralized bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss (R)) and carbonate apatite (Cytrans (R)) after a sinus lift. Results showed a significant difference in bone resorption between the Bio-Oss (R)-treated group (25.2%) and the Cytrans (R)-treated group (14.2%), indicating that Cytrans (R) is more promising for successful implant treatments requiring a sinus lift.