4.5 Article

Comparison of Pulse Wave Signal Monitoring Techniques with Different Fiber-Optic Interferometric Sensing Elements

期刊

PHOTONICS
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/photonics8050142

关键词

optical fiber sensor; biomedical sensor; optical coherence tomography; intermodal interferometer; singlemode-multimode-singlemode; Fabry-Perot interferometer; fiber Bragg grating; pulse wave; spectral interferometry

类别

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-72-00051]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-72-00051] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper compares the performance of different optical fiber pulse wave sensors, revealing that the OCT approach provides the best demodulated signal quality and is most robust against motion artifacts. Discussions on the advantages and drawbacks of all compared PW measurement approaches are also provided in terms of practical questions.
Pulse wave (PW) measurement is a highly prominent technique, used in biomedical diagnostics. Development of novel PW sensors with increased accuracy and reduced susceptibility to motion artifacts will pave the way to more advanced healthcare technologies. This paper reports on a comparison of performance of fiber optic pulse wave sensors, based on Fabry-Perot interferometer, fiber Bragg grating, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and singlemode-multimode-singlemode intermodal interferometer. Their performance was tested in terms of signal to noise ratio, repeatability of demodulated signals and suitability of demodulated signals for extraction of information about direct and reflected waves. It was revealed that the OCT approach of PW monitoring provided the best demodulated signal quality and was most robust against motion artifacts. Advantages and drawbacks of all compared PW measurement approaches in terms of practical questions, such as multiplexing capabilities and abilities to be interrogated by portable hardware are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据