4.7 Article

Simultaneous determination of 74 pesticide residues in Panax notoginseng by QuEChERS coupled with gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND HUMAN WELLNESS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 241-250

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fshw.2021.02.014

关键词

Panax notoginseng; QuEChERS; GC-MS/MS; Pesticide residues

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFC1702500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a method for simultaneous determination of 74 pesticide residues in Panax notoginseng and analyzed pesticide residues in 20 market samples in China. The method showed good linearity, recovery rates, and detection/quantification limits that met standards.
This study established a method for the simultaneous determination of 74 pesticide residues in Panax notoginseng by QuEChERS pretreatment method coupled with GC-MS/MS, and carried out pesticide residue analysis on 20 batches of market samples in China. The samples were extracted with acetonitrile, cleaned up with primary secondary amine (PSA) and octadecylsilane (C) and determined by GC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Matrix-matched calibration was recommended to combat the matrix effect. A good linearity was observed in the range of 10-500 ng/mL with correlation coefficients >= 0.9950. The mean recoveries for most of the pesticides were in the range of 70%-120% with RSD < 20%. The limits of detection ranged 0.28-2.00 mu g/kg, while the limits of quantification were 0.94-6.65 mu g/kg. Following the application of top-down approach, the expanded measurement uncertainty for all the analytes was < 30%. The proposed method was successfully applied to determine pesticide residues in 20 market samples in China, where 9 pesticides were detected and quintozene exceeded the criteria domestically and abroad. (C) 2021 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据