4.7 Review

Approaches to evaluate nutrition of minerals in food

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND HUMAN WELLNESS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 141-148

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fshw.2021.02.002

关键词

Mineral; Bioavailability; In vivo; In vitro

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System - Green Manure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review compares the applications, advantages, and critical control points of techniques for determining mineral bioavailability, categorizing them into chemical methods, in vitro models, and in vivo tests. While no single method is ideal for all micronutrients, certain methods can effectively evaluate mineral bioavailability under proper operation.
Numerous techniques have been developed to determine the bioavailability of minerals. Each method has specific detection objects with certain procedures to assure the results. This review focuses on a comprehensive comparison of the applications, advantages, and critical control points of these techniques. The commonly used approaches for assessing mineral bioavailability can be divided into three categories-chemical methods, in vitro models and in vivo tests. Chemical methods are first developed, and mainly simulating the digestion environment to give a rough prediction of mineral bioavailability. In vitro models mainly used different cells to simulate the process and environment of food digestion to assess the availability of minerals. In vivo tests are employing complex models to observe the bioavailability of minerals after complicated digestive process in animal models or human volunteers. This review summarizes the critical points of establishment of these relevant models, compares the advantages and limitations among three categories. Although no single bioavailability method is ideal for all micronutrients, certain methods under proper operation can indeed be employed to minimize the differences between simulated results and reality for effective evaluation of the bioavailability of minerals. (C) 2021 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据