4.5 Article

Electrode and Electrolyte Materials From Atomistic Simulations: Properties of LixFEPO4 Electrode and Zircon-Based Ionic Conductors

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.653542

关键词

orthophosphates; atomistic simulations (ab-initio calculations); energy storage materials; ceramics; thermodynamics; solid solution; solid-state electrolyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the thermodynamic properties of LixFePO4 and stabilizing zirconia compounds, showing different chemical characteristics under various conditions and having the potential for widespread application in energy storage.
LixFePO4 orthophosphates and fluorite- and pyrochlore-type zirconate materials are widely considered as functional compounds in energy storage devices, either as electrode or solid state electrolyte. These ceramic materials show enhanced cation exchange and anion conductivity properties that makes them attractive for various energy applications. In this contribution we discuss thermodynamic properties of LixFePO4 and yttria-stabilized zirconia compounds, including formation enthalpies, stability, and solubility limits. We found that at ambient conditions LixFePO4 has a large miscibility gap, which is consistent with existing experimental evidence. We show that cubic zirconia becomes stabilized with Y content of similar to 8%, which is in line with experimental observations. The computed activation energy of 0.92eV and ionic conductivity for oxygen diffusion in yttria-stabilized zirconia are also in line with the measured data, which shows that atomistic modeling can be applied for accurate prediction of key materials properties. We discuss these results with the existing simulation-based data on these materials produced by our group over the last decade. Last, but not least, we discuss similarities of the considered compounds in considering them as materials for energy storage and radiation damage resistant matrices for immobilization of radionuclides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据