4.6 Article

Stakeholder Perceptions on the Governance of Fisheries Systems Transformed by Hydroelectric Dam Development in the Madeira River, Brazil

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.575514

关键词

mitigation; inland fisheries; institutional arrangements; hydroelectric dams; social-ecological impacts; freshwater fisheries; Amazon; fisheries governance

资金

  1. CNPq/Brazil
  2. Brazilian Agency CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) [021/2012]
  3. PGCI/CAPES - International Cooperation Program [038/2013]
  4. Science Without Borders/PVE Project [88881.064958/2014-01]
  5. Tropical Conservation and Development Program (TCD) at University of Florida
  6. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1617413]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroelectric dams have significant impacts on freshwater fisheries, with changes in river hydrology and fish ecology playing a major role. Stakeholders perceive that governance arrangements for fisheries have weakened in the face of hydropower development, leading to insufficient mitigation of negative impacts on fisheries. Perspectives on the implications of governance arrangements and the impact of hydropower development vary among stakeholder groups.
Hydroelectric dams often have significant impacts on freshwater fisheries. Major impacts are known to be driven by changes in river hydrology and fish ecology, but the role of governance arrangements in mitigating or exacerbating fisheries impacts from hydropower development is less understood. This study presents an analysis of stakeholder perceptions about the effects of hydroelectric dam implementation on fisheries governance arrangements in the Madeira River basin, Brazil. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 stakeholders representing the fishers and fish traders, government, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector. Fishers, non-governmental, and private sector agents perceived hydropower development to be the strongest factor driving fisheries decline or change over the past 10 years, while government staff perceived overfishing to be an equally or even more important factor. Most stakeholders affirmed that fisheries governance arrangements have weakened in the face of hydropower development, and that these arrangements have been insufficient to effectively mitigate or compensate for negative impacts on fisheries. Fishers, non-governmental and private sector agents saw lack of opportunities to participate in fisheries governance as a major contributing factor, while government staff emphasized lack of qualified personnel, lack of trust between agencies, and control over the decision-making process held by hydropower companies. Perspectives on other implications of governance arrangements were shared across stakeholder groups. These included increased conflicts; lack of interaction and coordination between agencies; the fragility of fishers' social organization; lack of trust and reciprocity between organizations; and power imbalances between stakeholders. The results show that hydropower development impairs and changes relationships between diverse players involved in fisheries governance, which can exacerbate existing weaknesses and negatively affect fishery sustainability. Drawing from the perspectives and comments of the various stakeholders who participated in the study, we provide recommendations to improve freshwater fisheries governance in the Madeira River basin and in the Brazilian Amazon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据