4.4 Article

Hepatitis C in Uganda: Identification of infected blood donors for micro-elimination

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIRUS ERADICATION
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MEDISCRIPT LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2021.100041

关键词

Hepatitis C; blood donors; Uganda

资金

  1. Gilead Sciences under the grant `Conquering Hepatitis via Micro elimination (CHIME)' grant [ISRUG-18-10468]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the prevalence of active HCV infection and related factors among Ugandan blood donors, finding associations with factors such as age, place of birth, and marital status. Targeted interventions and linkage to care and treatment will be crucial in achieving the WHO elimination goals in this setting.
Background: The drive to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030 is underway. However, locally generated data on active infection is required to focus such efforts. We performed a regionally-inclusive survey to determine prevalence of active HCV, genotypes and related factors among Ugandan blood donors. Methods: Participants from regional blood banks and blood collection centers were surveyed for information on demographic, clinical and lifestyle factors. Blood was assayed for HCV infection, HCV genotypes and subtypes. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with active HCV infection. Results: Of 1243 participants, 1041 (83.7%) were male, average age (SD), 27.7 (9.8). Prevalence of active HCV infection was 7.8% and we identified 3 genotypes. Median age (adj. OR (95% CI) = 1.03 (1.01-1.06), p-value = 0.040)), Northern region of birth versus Central or Eastern (adj. OR (95% CI) = 10.25 (2.65-39.68), p-value = 0.001)), Northern residence, versus Central or Eastern (adj. OR (95% CI) = 0.23 (0.08-0.65), p-value = 0.006)), and being married (versus single/divorced) adj. OR 2.49(1.3-4.79), p-value = 0.006 were associated with active HCV infection. Conclusion: Targeted interventions in at-risk populations coupled with linkage to care and treatment will help achieve the WHO elimination goals in this setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据