4.3 Review

Are poor set-shifting and central coherence associated with everyday function in anorexia nervosa? A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40337-021-00392-x

关键词

Anorexia Nervosa; cognition; set-shifting; cognitive flexibility; central coherence; executive function; functional outcome; neuropsychology; quality of life; eating disorders

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The associations between set-shifting and central coherence performance measures and functional outcomes in individuals with Anorexia Nervosa are limited, with stronger findings in adult or mixed-age cohorts. Younger cohorts show that assessments of executive function in daily life are sensitive to cognitive-behavioral flexibility issues. Further research is needed to systematically assess the relationship between cognitive performance and functional outcome in AN.
Background There is increasing interest in associations between cognitive impairments and clinical symptoms in Anorexia Nervosa (AN), however, the relationship with everyday function is unclear. The current review synthesizes existing data regarding associations between scores on tests of set-shifting and central coherence and functional outcome measures for individuals with AN. Method A systematic electronic database search yielded 13 studies which included participants with current or lifetime AN where scores on a neuropsychological test of set-shifting or central coherence were directly or indirectly compared to a functional outcome measure. Results Associations between set-shifting and central coherence performance measures and functional outcomes were limited in number and noted only in adult or mixed-age cohorts. Associations were noted at subscale level, suggesting they are specific in nature. In younger cohorts, assessments of executive functioning in everyday life appear sensitive to cognitive-behavioral flexibility issues. Conclusions Associations between cognitive performance and functional outcome have not been as systematically assessed in AN as in other psychiatric disorders. Key factors to address in future research include: (a) the use of function measures which are sensitive to both the level of impairment, and specific rather than general impairments (b) the ecological validity of measures, (c) the task impurity problem, especially in regard to cognitive flexibility assessment, and (d) the need to measure both cognitive deficits and strengths, because tests of specific cognitive processes may underestimate the ability to function in daily life due to compensatory strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据