4.3 Review

The Contribution of Advanced Glycation End product (AGE) accumulation to the decline in motor function

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1186/s11556-016-0163-1

关键词

Advanced Glycation End products; Motor function; Ageing; Biomarker; Systematic review

资金

  1. Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Healthcare and Nursing, Hanze University Groningen
  2. Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen
  3. Frailty in Ageing Research Group and Gerontology Department, Free University of Brussels
  4. ZuidOostZorg, Organisation for Elderly Care, Drachten

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diminishing motor function is commonly observed in the elderly population and is associated with a wide range of adverse health consequences. Advanced Glycation End products (AGE's) may contribute to age-related decline in the function of cells and tissues in normal ageing. Although the negative effect of AGE's on the biomechanical properties of musculoskeletal tissues and the central nervous system have been previously described, the evidence regarding the effect on motor function is fragmented, and a systematic review on this topic is lacking. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted from a total of eight studies describing AGE's related to physical functioning, physical performance, and musculoskeletal outcome which reveals a positive association between high AGE's levels and declined walking abilities, inferior ADL, decreased muscle properties (strength, power and mass) and increased physical frailty. Elevated AGE's levels might be an indication to initiate (early) treatment such as dietary advice, muscle strengthening exercises, and functional training to maintain physical functions. Further longitudinal observational and controlled trial studies are necessary to investigate a causal relationship, and to what extent, high AGE's levels are a contributing risk factor and potential biomarker for a decline in motor function as a component of the ageing process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据