4.6 Article

Multimodal Deep Generative Models for Trajectory Prediction: A Conditional Variational Autoencoder Approach

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 295-302

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3043163

关键词

Autonomous vehicle navigation; deep learning methods; social HRI

类别

资金

  1. Toyota Research Institute (TRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human behavior prediction models are crucial for designing safe and proactive robot planning algorithms, but modeling complex interaction dynamics and capturing multiple possible outcomes is challenging. The CVAE approach can generate multimodal probability distributions over future human trajectories, prompting research on various methods for human behavior prediction.
Human behavior prediction models enable robots to anticipate how humans may react to their actions, and hence are instrumental to devising safe and proactive robot planning algorithms. However, modeling complex interaction dynamics and capturing the possibility of many possible outcomes in such interactive settings is very challenging, which has recently prompted the study of several different approaches. In this work, we provide a self-contained tutorial on a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) approach to human behavior prediction which, at its core, can produce a multimodal probability distribution over future human trajectories conditioned on past interactions and candidate robot future actions. Specifically, the goals of this tutorial paper are to review and build a taxonomy of state-of-the-art methods in human behavior prediction, from physics-based to purely data-driven methods, provide a rigorous yet easily accessible description of a data-driven, CVAE-based approach, highlight important design characteristics that make this an attractive model to use in the context of model-based planning for human-robot interactions, and provide important design considerations when using this class of models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据