4.6 Article

Multi-Resolution 3D Mapping With Explicit Free Space Representation for Fast and Accurate Mobile Robot Motion Planning

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 3553-3560

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3061989

关键词

Mapping; motion and path planning

类别

资金

  1. SLAMcore Ltd.
  2. Imperial College President's Scholarship
  3. ESPRC ORCA Robotics Hub [EP/R026173/1]
  4. EPSRC Aerial ABM [EP/N018494/1]
  5. Imperial College London
  6. EPSRC [EP/N018494/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed system utilizes adaptive-resolution volumetric mapping concept integrating with the hierarchical decomposition in an octree data structure, enabling fast collision queries for robot motion planning, and showing improvements in mapping accuracy and other aspects over existing techniques, particularly for high-resolution maps.
With the aim of bridging the gap between high quality reconstruction and robot motion planning, we propose an efficient system that leverages the concept of adaptive-resolution volumetric mapping, which naturally integrates with the hierarchical decomposition of space in an octree data structure. Instead of a Truncated Signed Distance Function (TSDF), we adopt mapping of occupancy probabilities in log-odds representation, which allows to represent both surfaces, as well as the entire free, i.e. observed space, as opposed to unobserved space. We introduce a method for choosing resolution -on the fly- in real-time by means of a multi-scale max-min pooling of the input depth image. The notion of explicit free space mapping paired with the spatial hierarchy in the data structure, as well as map resolution, allows for collision queries, as needed for robot motion planning, at unprecedented speed. We quantitatively evaluate mapping accuracy, memory, runtime performance, and planning performance showing improvements over the state of the art, particularly in cases requiring high resolution maps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据