4.6 Article

The independent role of prenatal and postnatal exposure to active and passive smoking on the development of early wheeze in children

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 115-124

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01016-2015

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [226285]
  2. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI) grant [072058]
  3. UK Medical Research Council
  4. Wellcome Trust [092731]
  5. University of Bristol
  6. MRC [G0401540] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [G9815508, G0401540] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maternal smoking during pregnancy increases childhood asthma risk, but health effects in children of nonsmoking mothers passively exposed to tobacco smoke during pregnancy are unclear. We examined the association of maternal passive smoking during pregnancy and wheeze in children aged <= 2 years. Individual data of 27 993 mother-child pairs from 15 European birth cohorts were combined in pooled analyses taking into consideration potential confounders. Children with maternal exposure to passive smoking during pregnancy and no other smoking exposure were more likely to develop wheeze up to the age of 2 years (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20) compared with unexposed children. Risk of wheeze was further increased by children's postnatal passive smoke exposure in addition to their mothers' passive exposure during pregnancy (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19-1.40) and highest in children with both sources of passive exposure and mothers who smoked actively during pregnancy (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.59-1.88). Risk of wheeze associated with tobacco smoke exposure was higher in children with an allergic versus nonallergic family history. Maternal passive smoking exposure during pregnancy is an independent risk factor for wheeze in children up to the age of 2 years. Pregnant females should avoid active and passive exposure to tobacco smoke for the benefit of their children's health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据