4.7 Article

Assessing the impacts of climate change on hydrological regimes and fish EQR in two Danish catchments

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100798

关键词

Climate change impacts; Groundwater; Fish EQR; Hydrological modelling and Denmark

资金

  1. NIFA project - Danish EPA/Landbrugsstyrelsen [33010-NIFA-18-696]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed future changes in hydrological regime, extremes, groundwater levels, and fish ecological quality ratio (EQR) in two large-scale catchments in Denmark. It identified strengths and weaknesses of EQR assessments based on symbolic regression methods compared to expert assessments and found that the impact of climate change on groundwater levels and fish EQRs is more complex and somewhat ambiguous across different scenarios and catchments.
Study region: Two large-scale catchments in Denmark: Ringlobing fiord and Mid-Zealand catchments. Study focus: Future changes in hydrological regime, extremes, groundwater levels and ecological quality ratio (EQR) for fish were assessed. Based on an ensemble of 17 bias-corrected regional climate models forced by the emission scenario RCP8.5, a dry, a medium and a wet model were identified for the future period 2071-2100. Changes in water balances for catchments, impacts on groundwater level and fish ecological quality ration (fish EQR) were evaluated. The impact changes were based on an integrated, transient, coupled groundwater and surface-water flow model, set up with a horizontal resolution of 200m x 200m for the two catchments. New hydrological insights for the region: Strengths and weaknesses of EQR assessments based on symbolic regression methods compared to expert assessments based on flow calendar and max flow changes in percent exceedance thresholds (Q95) were identified. While the modelled impact of climate change on monthly flow and flow calendar follows the same pattern at all monitoring stations, the impact on groundwater level and fish EQRs are more complex, and somewhat ambiguous across realisations and catchments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据