4.5 Article

Metabolic modelling reveals broad changes in gut microbial metabolism in inflammatory bowel disease patients with dysbiosis

期刊

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41540-021-00178-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [757922]
  2. National Institute of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA) [1RF1AG058942, 1U19AG063744]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland [APC/SFI/12/RC/2273_P2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn's Disease, are characterized by changes in blood and fecal metabolites and alterations in gut microbiome composition. A systems biology framework was used to connect microbial strains and fecal metabolites, revealing differences in metabolite contributions and diversity between healthy and dysbiotic microbiomes, leading to potential novel therapeutic and dietary interventions.
Inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn's Disease, are characterised by an altered blood and faecal metabolome, and changes in gut microbiome composition. Here, we present an efficient, scalable, tractable systems biology framework to mechanistically link microbial strains and faecal metabolites. We retrieve strain-level relative abundances from metagenomics data from a cohort of paediatric Crohn's Disease patients with and without dysbiosis and healthy control children and construct and interrogate a personalised microbiome model for each sample. Predicted faecal secretion profiles and strain-level contributions to each metabolite vary broadly between healthy, dysbiotic, and non-dysbiotic microbiomes. The reduced microbial diversity in IBD results in reduced numbers of secreted metabolites, especially in sulfur metabolism. We demonstrate that increased potential to synthesise amino acids is linked to Proteobacteria contributions, in agreement with experimental observations. The established modelling framework yields testable hypotheses that may result in novel therapeutic and dietary interventions targeting the host-gut microbiome-diet axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据