4.6 Article

Optimal Degree of Hypothermia in Total Arch Replacement for Type A Aortic Dissection

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.668333

关键词

aortic dissection; aortic aneurysm (thoracic); cardiopulmoanry bypass; hypothermia (induced); surgery

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFB1107102]
  2. CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine [2016-I2M-1-016]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1002600]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2017A070701013, 2017B090904034, 2017B030314109, 2019B020230003]
  5. Guangdong peak project [DFJH201802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that in total arch replacement surgery for type A aortic dissection, a higher degree of hypothermic cardiac arrest has a certain effect on reducing the risk of composite major outcomes, especially in older patients. Quartile analysis showed that the lower temperature group had worse outcomes, while the higher temperature group had better outcomes.
Background: We sought to investigate the best degree of hypothermic cardiac arrest (HCA) in type A aortic dissection (TAAD) with a cohort of 1,018 cases receiving total arch replacement from 2013 to 2018 in Fuwai Hospital. Method: The cohort was divided by DHCA (<= 24 degrees C, n = 580) vs. MHCA (>24 degrees C, n = 438), and interquartile range (Q1-Q4). Primary endpoints included mortality, stroke, paraplegia, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which were summarized as composite major outcomes (CMO). Results: The Odds Ratio (OR) of CMO for MHCA was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5-1.0, p = 0.06) (unadjusted) and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.4-1.0, p = 0.055) (adjusted). DHCA group tended to have a significantly longer CPB time (175.6 +/- 45.6 vs. 166.8 +/- 49.8 min, p = 0.003), longer hospital stay (16.0 +/- 13.6 vs. 13.5 +/- 6.8 days, p < 0.001), and ICU stay [5.0 (3.9-6.6) vs. 3.8 (2.0-5.6) days]. A significantly greater blood loss was observed in DHCA group, with a greater requirement for RBC and platelet transfusion. Of note, MHCA showed a significant protective effect (60% risk reduction) for older patients (above 60 years) (OR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.8; p = 0.009). By quartering, Q1 had significantly higher mortality (10.9%) than Q4 (5.2%) (p = 0.035). For other comparisons, the gap was significantly widened in quartering between Q1 and Q4, i.e., the lower the temperature, the worse the outcomes, and vice versa. Propensity score matching and sensitivity analyses confirmed the above findings. Conclusions: A paradigm change from DHCA to MHCA may be encouraged in TAAD arch operation, especially for the elderly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据