4.7 Article

Brain size and neuron numbers drive differences in yawn duration across mammals and birds

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02019-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 26806]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [18-15020S]
  3. Grant Agency of Charles University [1438217]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies suggest that yawning evolved as a brain cooling mechanism, with brain mass and neuron numbers influencing yawning duration. Mammals yawn longer than birds with similar brain and body masses, supporting the brain cooling hypothesis.
Recent studies indicate that yawning evolved as a brain cooling mechanism. Given that larger brains have greater thermolytic needs and brain temperature is determined in part by heat production from neuronal activity, it was hypothesized that animals with larger brains and more neurons would yawn longer to produce comparable cooling effects. To test this, we performed the largest study on yawning ever conducted, analyzing 1291 yawns from 101 species (55 mammals; 46 birds). Phylogenetically controlled analyses revealed robust positive correlations between yawn duration and (1) brain mass, (2) total neuron number, and (3) cortical/pallial neuron number in both mammals and birds, which cannot be attributed solely to allometric scaling rules. These relationships were similar across clades, though mammals exhibited considerably longer yawns than birds of comparable brain and body mass. These findings provide further evidence suggesting that yawning is a thermoregulatory adaptation that has been conserved across amniote evolution. Massen, Hartlieb, Martin et al. study the duration of yawns across mammals and birds to test the brain cooling hypothesis. Consistent with this hypothesis, their findings indicate that brain mass and neuron numbers influence yawn duration, and that mammals yawn longer than birds with similar brain and body masses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据