4.7 Article

Green and facile fabrication of nanoporous silicon@carbon from commercial alloy with high graphitization degree for high-energy lithium-ion batteries

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00238

关键词

Silicon anode; Carbon; Vacuum distillation; High graphitization; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. State Key Programof National Natural Science of China [61633015]
  2. Discipline Construction of HighLevel Talents of Shandong University [31370089963078]
  3. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program [JCYJ20190807093405503]
  4. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province [tsqn201812002, ts20190908, ts201511004]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972198]
  6. Young Scholars Programof Shandong University [2016WLJH03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study synthesized uniform porous Si@C using a green vacuum distillation method, which improved electrical conductivity and ability to accommodate volume changes of the silicon anode, while maintaining stable battery performance. Due to its unique structure, pSi@C exhibited superior rate capability and stable cycling performance.
Silicon (Si) is considered as one of the most promising anodes for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, rapid capacity decay caused by huge volume change and low electrical conductivity limit its further development. Herein, uniform porous Si@C (pSi@C) from commercial Mg2Si alloy and pitch is synthesized by green vacuum distillation method. During this process, the low boiling-point Mg is evaporated and cycled to form porous Si. Besides, the high-graphitization C layer is obtained because the metallic Mg favors the graphitization degree of C. Asa result, the carbon coating layer and unique porous structure can improve electrical conductivity and accommodate volume change of Si anode without destroying solid electrolyte interface. The optimal pSi@C shows improved lithium storage with stable cyclability and superior rate capability. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据