4.7 Article

Random choices facilitate solutions to collective network coloring problems by artificial agents

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102340

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1217336]
  2. NIH COBRE Program [1P20GM130454]
  3. Neukom CompX Faculty Grant
  4. Dartmouth Faculty Startup Fund
  5. Walter & Constance Burke Research Initiation Award
  6. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1217336] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global coordination is essential to solving challenging collective action problems, recent empirical studies show that the presence of noisy autonomous agents can greatly improve human performance in solving network coordination problems. The efficacy of resolving color conflicts depends on the implementation of random behavior of agents and specific population characteristics.
Global coordination is required to solve a wide variety of challenging collective action problems from network colorings to the tragedy of the commons. Recent empirical study shows that the presence of a few noisy autonomous agents can greatly improve collective performance of humans in solving networked color coordination games. To provide analytical insights into the role of behavioral randomness, here we study myopic artificial agents attempting to solve similar network coloring problems using decision update rules that are only based on local information but allow random choices at various stages of their heuristic reasonings. We show that the resulting efficacy of resolving color conflicts is dependent on the implementation of random behavior of agents and specific population characteristics. Our work demonstrates that distributed greedy optimization algorithms exploiting local information should be deployed in combination with occasional exploration via random choices in order to overcome local minima and achieve global coordination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据