4.7 Article

Elucidating the interactions between the rust Hemileia vastatrix and a Calonectria mycoparasite and the coffee plant

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102352

关键词

-

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Programa de Estudante-Convenio de Pos-Graduacao (PEC-PG) from CAPES
  3. World Coffee Research (WCR)
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento do Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  5. Conselho Nacional do Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calonectria hemileiae shows promise as a biocontrol agent of coffee leaf rust (CLR), with the ability to inhibit rust spore germination and enhance plant resistance through mycoparasitism. The fungus demonstrated significant reduction in CLR severity both in vitro and in planta experiments, with no damage to coffee photosynthesis observed unlike fungicide applications.
Calonectria hemileiae, a fungus associated with pustules of the coffee leaf rust (CLR, Hemileia vastatrix) in Brazil, was tested in vitro and in planta to assess its biocontrol potential. The fungus inhibited the germination of rust spores by over 80%. CLR severity was reduced by 93% when Calonectria was applied to coffee leaf discs inoculated with H. vastatrix, whilst a reduction of 70-90% was obtained for in planta experiments. Mycoparasitism was demonstrated through the fulfillment of Koch's postulates. Elucidation of the biochemical interaction between Calonectria and Hemileia on coffee plants indicated that the mycoparasite was able to increase plant resistance to rust infection. Coffee plants sprayed with Calonectria alone showed greater levels of chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, ascorbate peroxidase and peroxidase. Although effective in controlling the rust, fungicide applications damaged coffee photosynthesis, whereas no harm was caused by Calonectria. We conclude that C. hemileiae shows promise as a biocontrol agent of CLR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据