4.7 Article

Experimental and natural evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection-induced activation of type I interferon responses

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102477

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. Canada Research Chairs Program
  5. Ontario Early Career Researcher Award
  6. CIHR COVID-19 rapid response grant
  7. CIHR New Investigator Award
  8. Ontario Early Researcher Award
  9. Zhejiang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 proteins can inhibit human type I interferon responses, and the timing and extent of interferon production are associated with COVID-19 severity. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a type I interferon response in vitro and in moderate cases of COVID-19, with physiological levels of IFNa being sufficient to suppress SARS-CoV-2 replication in human airway cells.
Type I interferons (IFNs) are our first line of defense against virus infection. Recent studies have suggested the ability of SARS-CoV-2 proteins to inhibit IFN responses. Emerging data also suggest that timing and extent of IFN production is associated withmanifestation of COVID-19 severity. In spite of progress in understanding how SARS-CoV-2 activates antiviral responses, mechanistic studies into wild-type SARS-CoV-2-mediated induction and inhibition of human type I IFN responses are scarce. Here we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a type I IFN response in vitro and inmoderate cases of COVID-19. In vitro stimulation of type I IFN expression and signaling in human airway epithelial cells is associated with activation of canonical transcriptions factors, and SARS-CoV-2 is unable to inhibit exogenous induction of these responses. Furthermore, we show that physiological levels of IFNa detected in patients with moderate COVID-19 is sufficient to suppress SARS-CoV-2 replication in human airway cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据