4.7 Article

Induced lineage promiscuity undermines the efficiency of all-trans-retinoid-acid-induced differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102410

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0107802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81770143, 81970130]
  3. Shanghai Commission of Science and Technology [17PJ1405800]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant [20171902]
  5. Shanghai Pujiang Program [17PJ1405800]
  6. Shanghai DF Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ATRA can induce near-normal differentiation towards mature granulocytes in APL/AML-M3 cells, but induces incomplete and promiscuous differentiation in AML-M2 cells, characterized by coinduction of myelopoiesis and lymphopoiesis gene expression programs.
All-trans retinoid acid (ATRA) can induce terminal differentiation of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), also known as the M3 subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, non-APL types of AML respond poorly to ATRA-induced differentiation, and the mechanism underlying cell-type-specific resistance against ATRA remains unclear. Here, we use single-cell transcriptome analysis to compare the differentiation trajectories of two AML cell types during ATRA treatment. We show that in NB4 (APL/AML-M3) cells, ATRA activates canonical myeloid lineage factors-including SPI1, CEBPE, and STAT1-to direct near-normal differentiation toward mature granulocytes. By contrast, in HL60 (AML-M2) cells, ATRA-induced differentiation is incomplete and promiscuous, which is characterized by coinduction of both myelopoiesis and lymphopoiesis gene expression programs, as well as transient activation of cis-regulatory elements associated with myeloid differentiation. Our study suggests that the differentiation inducing capacity of ATRA in certain subtypes of AML may be compromised by therapy-induced lineage promiscuity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据