4.7 Article

Organic Molecule-Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide for All-Carbon Asymmetric Supercapacitor Applications

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 5493-5503

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00150

关键词

energy storage; covalent functionalization; asymmetric device; supercapacitor; organic molecular electrode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773187, 21563027, 21163017, 20963009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully prepared organic molecular electrodes by using polyhydric organic molecules and decorating them with graphene hydrogel, enhancing capacitance and energy density. By utilizing two different organic molecules as positive and negative electrodes, an all-carbon asymmetric supercapacitor was constructed, achieving high energy density and power output, capable of lighting up LED lights.
An organic molecular electrode (OME) is obtained, in which the polyhydric organic molecules (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzamide, THBA) act as a guest molecule to decorate graphene hydrogel (rGO(1)). The THBA acts as a spacer to prevent the rGO sheet from aggregation and provides an active center for OME. In the three-electrode configuration, the prepared OME (rGO(1)-THBA) presents a capacitance of 390.6 F g(-1) and has a capacitance retention of 73.7% even when the scanning rate increases from 5 to 100 mV s(-1). Furthermore, we synthesize an organic molecule 1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxylic diimide (NDP) and immobilize it onto the rGO surface to form another OME (rGO-NDP) as the counter electrode. An all-carbon asymmetric supercapacitor (rGO(1)-THBA//rGO-NDP: ASC) is constructed by using rGO(1)-THBA and rGO-NDP as the positive and negative electrodes, respectively. The resultant device achieves a capacitance of 70.8 F g(-1) and delivers an energy density of 14 W h kg(-1), supplying the power of 590 W kg(-1). More importantly, the two asymmetric devices in series connection are able to light up 24 LED lights for 100 s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据